The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: Another S40 question S40-V40 2001

I notice the same problem with the 2001 S40 I test drove. I like having the option of sport or eco with my 2000 S40. I do think the 2000's are faster, but it's not all due to your tranny. It's your turbo, somedays are great for turbo's somedays it's not. It all has to do with the weather. also give your engine some time to break in, it takes somewhere around 10k+ before it's broken in. My beef with this new learning tranny is, if you drive conservative to save gas or whatever don't expect it to react like it was in sports mode, it's going to try to give you power by cutting off your A/C but not a great kickdown to save you gas and stuff. This could be why Volvo can say it get better gas mileage and stuff, but with the 2000's what are they going to say! Sport mode you get this gas mileage and in Eco you get this? Or maybe by getting rid of sport mode they think it more classy or something?






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.