The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

850's complexity 850 1996

Wow!

You edged-out a 115HP, 1.7L four-cylinder, weighing 2,500 lbs. with your 168HP, 2.4L five-cylinder, weighing 3,200 lbs.

I am impressed.

Come on. Pick on someone your own size.

I've got a friend who works for the Acura division of American Honda. They do extensive analysis of the manufacturing processes of their competitors.

In fact, the parts-count on a Volvo is appreciably higher than that of a Honda. The labor required to assemble a Volvo is also appreciably higher than that of a Honda.

You may like your Volvo more than you would like a Honda, but the fact is that, by any measure, a Volvo is more complex than the typical Japanese car.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.