The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Taking the ECU Plunge S70 2000

The 6.2 seems pretty questionable to me as well. IPD puts the upgraded T5 at around 6.2 and the GLT at 7.2. Probably the more important fact is that the upgrade will take about a second off of where you were. Where you were is highly dependent on the specific car, the driver, and even the weather. So 6.2 for the GLT might require the most abusive launch, perfect weather, tailwind and down hill :) Whereas 7.2 might be more realistic with the average car, the average driver, and perhaps non-ideal weather. Also the 7.2 covers sedan, wagon, and AWD drive in the published numbers - all of these cars are certainly not equal. The AWD drive system will add about 0.5 in 0-60 and the extra weight of the wagon will add some more. So somewhere between 6.2 and 7.2 is probably realistic for my particular car.

I should have the thing back on Friday.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.