The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

IPD Cat Back... Cost vs.performance. Is it worth it? 850

Getting back to cost vs. performance again, having the "R" ECU with rated 240HP and stock exhast as a refence point, to get to the rated 275HP I need the ECU $900 and cat-back $700 for a total of $1600 for only 35HP gains. That works out to be about $46/HP.

10HP for the cat-back, is that with or without ECU upgrade? That would probably be only 5-6HP without. This will make the cost per HP even greater.

I'm just rambling right now but these are significant expenses and something to think about. If I had only a T-5 ECU with 220 rated HP, this would look more attractive but with the R ECU things looks less attractive. I'm sure that the power and torque curves are better with the upgrades but how much better? Thats a subjective call and everyone will have their own opinions...

I'll start with custom built cat-back and take it from there...






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.