Volvo AWD 850 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 3/2002 850 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: Did You Have to Replace your Evaporator at Your Expense ? 850 96

Based on my experience R-134a is not more corrosive than the one (R22, or R12) it replaced. There is lots of equipment with R134a that is not failing just because the industry switched from one refrigerant to the other. But even if it were the case it is still no excuse to have short life evaporators installed. Volvo and other car manufacturers should use parts that will stand up to the environment. I don't think that any of us forced them to switch refrigerants. They did it on their own under government pressure to get into more environmentally friendly refrigerants (ozone hole) and if the new components weren't tested enough then they should fix them. Several years ago there was leaded gas available. One of the purposes for the lead was to lubricate valves, etc. When unleaded fuel got introduced valves and other components got redesigned to cope with the lack of lubrication provided by lead. I guess engines didn't suddenly started to seize and we didn't need to get the usual excuse.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Did You Have to Replace your Evaporator at Your Expense ?
posted by  someone claiming to be Bernie  on Mon Dec 17 02:43 CST 2001 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.