Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2005 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Opinions on 1975 164e ? 140-160

My view, as a longtime 164 owner (since 1971) is that the considerations
are two: Condition and transmission. I am not interested in a BW35 auto,
but the condition of the body and the mechanical workings are very important
too. If it is rusty in very many places, it is probably not worth messing with,
other than a parts car for a body in better shape. Likewise if the engine
or tranny is bad it is also not worthwhile. Having said that, the 75 is a special
year as it is the only year of any Volvo that had both D-jet fuel injection and
electronic ignition. It also had some other features that didn't show up in
earlier models. It was somewhat lower-powered than earlier models but could be
easily brought up with a little work on the ports and the compression ratio,
and maybe a better cam (D or VV71, for example).
--
George Downs Bartlesville, Heart of the USA!






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Opinions on 1975 164e ? [140-160]
posted by  DougC  on Sun Apr 8 16:17 CST 2007 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.