Volvo RWD 700 Forum

INDEX FOR 10/2025(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2003 700 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD




  REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

1988 745 Turbo/manual $1100 700 1988

A friend in Maine passed this on to my son, who suggested I post it here.

The pictures look just swell.

http://maine.craigslist.org/cto/5346247993.html


--
Bruce Young, '93 940-NA (current), 240s (one V8), 140s, 122s, since '63.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    1988 745 Turbo/manual $1100 700 1988

    do not know that much about 740's, but what caught my eye was the OD.
    In the 240 series, from 87 on the Manual Tranny was the M47 - true 5 Speed and the New Plastic single big headlights.

    So I checked the Volvo Owners Manual link and found that indeed the 745 Turbo had indeed came with those dual square headlamps and

    Manual transmission: fully synchronized five-speed with electrically operated overdrive

    http://new.volvocars.com/ownersdocs/1988/1988_specs/88_740_turbo_wagon.html

    so how come the 240's got the M47 which was then replaced by the M47II, which was to fix the bad points found in the first generation of the M47.

    Did they know that the M47 couldn't handle it and so stuck with the M46???








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      1988 745 Turbo/manual $1100 700 1988

      Likely not...more likely the typical "running change" common to smaller manufacturers. Worldwide...240 was a bigger seller so the new tranny kept it valid longer.








  •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

    1988 745 Turbo/manual $1100 700 1988

    It looks like a decent deal if the East coast rust hasn't gotten hold. It is stated that the OD is shot but there is another unit ready for installation. I believe the original OD would have been the J-type which was a stouter unit fitted behind turbo engines in the 700's. Not that many out there compared to the older P-type. Both will fit, so which one is being supplied as the ready-to-install spare?

    We all love our Volvos so don't take this as criticism, but the seller mentions "top rated in safety/crash tests"...

    That was close to 30 years ago. There's a Youtube video out there with a clip from some British TV show about cars (don't think it was "Top Gear"), in which they do an offset frontal crash of a 740 wagon and some modern but tiny Renault sedan and the little Renault comes off much, much better. There was significant distortion of the Volvo's firewall and floorpan into the driver's area, with strong likelihood of leg injuries.

    Not to knock Volvo's achievements of those earlier days, but time has marched on. So has Volvo's - and everyone's - crash safety engineering.
    --
    Bob: Son's XC70, my 83 244DL, 89 745 (Chev LT-1 V8), 98 S90 (recently sold) and 2010 XC60. Also '77 MGB and four old motorcycles








    •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

      Correction 700 1988

      Correction - the crashed wagon was a 940. Only minor cosmetic differences from the 740. Here's the video clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBDyeWofcLY
      --
      Bob: Son's XC70, my 83 244DL, 89 745 (Chev LT-1 V8), 98 S90 (recently sold) and 2010 XC60. Also '77 MGB and four old motorcycles








      •   REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

        Correction 700 1988

        Not sure what specifically in the original post prompted this but I hope is is informative to those the flaunt older Volvo Safety. It was WAY ahead of its time in the 1960's-1980's..even the 1990's compared to many cars. If the SPECIFIC reason you are looking at an older Volvo is passive safety, please move on and look at a late 1990's or better Civic/Carolla/Camry/Accord.

        I was reminded of this recently when an acquaintance was sandwiched so hard (closing speed of rear car in excess of 50 mph) in a 1993 240. Airbag worked. Crumple zones (circa 1974 with minor improvements in the early 1980's) did what then could and saved her life but at a cost of weeks in the hospital and continuing recovery.

        I drive my red block Volvo for what it is:

        Rugged
        Durable
        Rebuildable
        Approachable as a DIY mechanic
        Useful
        And very, very good for ACTIVE safety







<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.