Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2004 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

To turbo or not? 200

posted by  Erwin on  Tue Dec 3 05:25 CST 2002
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Thu Oct 23 10:39 CST 2014
[RELATED]

As posted yesterday, I'll be selling my '95 855t and Caravan to put my wife and myself into 240s and have a big chunk of change left over the kids college funds and an old BMW R100RS.

She'll get a '90ish 240 wagon but for me it's wide open. Learning what I have about A/C systems in the 240s (thanks guys) I'm comfortable with an older model as long as it's rust-free.

Now, to turbo or not. I believe the 240's normally aspirated 2.3 is rated about 105 hp and the turbo around 150 or thereabouts. I may be off a few horses but bear with me. I'll miss the power (222hp) of my 855t but really, in accepting that I'll be stepping down significantly in power, would looking into a 240 Turbo be something to consider? I'm thinking I won't get anywhere near the rush my 855t provides so why bother. How do the normally aspirated engines respond to standard performance mods such as performance camshaft, headwork, header etc? Just curious.

Opinions please?
--
Erwin in Memphis, '95 855t






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New To turbo or not? [200]
posted by  Erwin  on Tue Dec 3 05:25 CST 2002 >
  • New To turbo or not?
    posted by  someone claiming to be dlot  on Tue Dec 3 06:15 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.