The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Wait a minute... 140-160

tim asked if 1.5 would be ideal.

What is he actually going to use this thing for?

also with the longer rods and shorter piston compresion hieght he will get less rod angularity and less piston rock. so he will get a better ring seal.

The stock B20 layout is just fine as is for piston rock & angularity.

i have bent stock rods in a b20 when my dizzy exploded and let the advance go all the way out.

You must have blown the head gasket, let some water in & hydrauliced it to have bent the rod like that.

i think in tuning the motor he will see detonation atleast a couple of times.

Do you know what bore he's going to use?










USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.