The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

b20 fuel injected engine conversion 120-130 1968

Others have made some good arguments in favor of carbs - and if reliability is the priority, SUs are the way to go. Prices for injected bits are only increasing - and if an injection component fails somewhere inconvenient, you may well be without wheels.

If you really still want to do a conversion, it can be done and it isn't really all that difficult. The gas tank issue is one I've heard a number of times, but on my injected 122 there were never any fuel supply issues despite using the stock tank. I ran it well below a quarter tank many times. With overdrive, the car got a consistent 32mpg on the highway.

I wouldn't recommend djet because of the component costs, but this is how one such car came together:

http://www.vclassics.com/archive/d_jet.htm

Best,

Cameron
122SC,444
Rose City






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.