The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Hey, engine builders, I need some guidance. 120-130 1966

WRT to "D" cam wear, I've been fortunate maybe, but the only problem I've had with one, was a '73 1800ES that had about 70k miles on it at the time one of the lobes went flat.

The CWC billets solved a lot of problems, mostly the narrower lobes & better positioning than the earlier cams. I believe they first appeared in '74. When we use to regrind the older style cores, we'd narrow the lobes to SBC widths & make sure they were offset properly relative to the lifter bores.

Also, the spring pressures I use are around 135lb on the seat with a slightly stiffer rate + being a hell of a lot bigger, the exhaust opens a lot sooner, which means it's opening against extra cylinder pressure on the exhaust.










USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.