The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Clarification... 200 1989

IMHO, the whole lower ball joint arrangement is WAY over engineered compared to some other cars. The bolts bolting the lower ball joint on for instance are massive and the balljoint flange is equally massive for this little car. The way those four bolts bolt up into the bottom of the strut is a very stout arrangement, doesn't scare me one bit to reuse the bolts as long as they are NOT corroded (which is something the engineers may have been concerned about, being from a cold climate) and they were always properly torqued in the past (not over torqued). They are not torque-to-yield or anything like that either. The whole lower ball joint setup on my Alfa 164 is way less stout in it's arrangement and it's a high performance car with front wheel drive to boot and I have not heard of any trouble with those. Just my opinion and I am sure others, including dealers are reusing those bolts. But, it WILL make you feel safer to replace them, understandably.
Charles






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.