Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2005 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Clarification... 200 1989

IMHO, the whole lower ball joint arrangement is WAY over engineered compared to some other cars. The bolts bolting the lower ball joint on for instance are massive and the balljoint flange is equally massive for this little car. The way those four bolts bolt up into the bottom of the strut is a very stout arrangement, doesn't scare me one bit to reuse the bolts as long as they are NOT corroded (which is something the engineers may have been concerned about, being from a cold climate) and they were always properly torqued in the past (not over torqued). They are not torque-to-yield or anything like that either. The whole lower ball joint setup on my Alfa 164 is way less stout in it's arrangement and it's a high performance car with front wheel drive to boot and I have not heard of any trouble with those. Just my opinion and I am sure others, including dealers are reusing those bolts. But, it WILL make you feel safer to replace them, understandably.
Charles






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New OEM vs Aftermarket strut mounts??? Lower strut anchors no longer available from Volvo. Yikes! [200][1989]
posted by  245DogWaggin  on Sat Dec 22 08:08 CST 2007 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.