The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Charcoal canister removal- any reason to leave it on? 200 1989

posted by  Joe Heart on  Wed Mar 4 04:35 CST 2009
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri May 21 03:41 CST 2010
[RELATED]

Well, Im no expert on this, but I did a low cost fixy for this as well when I first got this car about two months ago.

The two lines traveling to the TB were about 3 bucks from a local auto store (proper diam.)

I noticed after routing the hoses and connecting, that this formerly unconnected part in the ride (whom the prior owner(s) must have opted to ditch due to the same problem you mention of rotted lines unhooked); ended me up with a slight notice of better standing idle.

Plus I feel like the excess unfired fumes will be preserved (idealy) and travel back into the fuel tank (third hose you mention) for burning lata.

Thats just my short quip on it tho.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.