The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Wheelbase 1970 and 1971 140-160

you know... I honestly don't know about any of those issues... I did the swap before I knew of the wheel base difference. Since I swapped it all out though, well... it bolted up fine.

For what it's worth, I used a M41, driveshaft, and rear from a '71 142E, with all the 142E suspension...I replaced the BW35 back that came in my '70. it seems fine, but.. it could be the springs are bowing.. I don't know. I've not driven the car in a year or so, but I did put about 10k spirited miles on after the swap with no problems...

Except them front fenders... seems the '70 and earlier front fenders are less accepting of Virgos.. again, another change I'd not known about. The Virgos were fine exception only the most extreme suspension travel in hard turning situations (read.. 4 wheelin')

--
-Matt I ♥ my ♂






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.