The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Where's the boost? part two 200 1984

Yeah I kind of suspect that too. I have replaced the hose that goes over the valve cover to the intake, but I have not done the short one that goes down to the actuator. I am also going to bypass the boost switch by the CI unit in case the its stuck open or something. Too much snow on the ground right now to go crawling under the beast. I think I get better fuel economy that that. Its hard to compare though because we use liters per hundred kilometers in Canada, and you gallon is smaller then ours. Neither of my Volvos is great if you compare it to the girlfriends Civic, but I was surprised that the beat up old turbo did as well as my 89. I would have thought the 2.4 fuel injection would make the red block more efficient than the ancient CI fuel injection. Plus the turbo has lower compression.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.