The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Quick note in addition to posts 900 1994

Now I get it!

Thanks for the re-explanation. I think I'm suffering from paint fume inhalation or something, as I understand less things week by week.

I suppose that the car being on the ground at least partially wouldn't have a whole lot of effect on the torque of the nut, since it should be seated flush on the stub axle by that point. In my personal opinion (debunkers, note: "opinion") that would work well and would certainly reduce the risk of yanking the car off of a jack or stands by heaving on a 3' breaker bar.

Again thanks for the patience. Sometimes it takes me a while.
--
Chris Herbst
1992 945, 71k
Volvo shop tech






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.