The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

960 Reliability/Expense 700 1988

Zach,

You are the man...I respect the fact that you have just had a major engine failure and yet you still appreciate your Volvo. It seems that too many people are so quick to badmouth their cars (especially the Volvo 960) when something goes wrong. I too have been considering the idea of purchasing a 960 (though all of the ones I have looked at have been 1995 models). It seems that most here are quick to complain about the 960 and ALL of it's features. I don't own a 960, but having owned a few Volvos before, I can safely assume that Volvo would not manufacture a "bad" car (or one that is not worth owning). Anyway, as I said, if you still appreciate your 960 after the recent troubles, then I am certain that I would enjoy owning one. It is nice to see a "good" 960 testimonial once in a while. Good call Zach...

Joe Schaefer - 1981 240 Turbo w/232k miles, 1988 760 Turbo w/225k miles (Both cars run like a raped ape...)






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.