Volvo RWD 700 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2002 700 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

960 Reliability/Expense 700 1988

posted by  someone claiming to be Joe Schaefer on  Wed Jul 31 11:53 CST 2002 [RELATED]

Zach,

You are the man...I respect the fact that you have just had a major engine failure and yet you still appreciate your Volvo. It seems that too many people are so quick to badmouth their cars (especially the Volvo 960) when something goes wrong. I too have been considering the idea of purchasing a 960 (though all of the ones I have looked at have been 1995 models). It seems that most here are quick to complain about the 960 and ALL of it's features. I don't own a 960, but having owned a few Volvos before, I can safely assume that Volvo would not manufacture a "bad" car (or one that is not worth owning). Anyway, as I said, if you still appreciate your 960 after the recent troubles, then I am certain that I would enjoy owning one. It is nice to see a "good" 960 testimonial once in a while. Good call Zach...

Joe Schaefer - 1981 240 Turbo w/232k miles, 1988 760 Turbo w/225k miles (Both cars run like a raped ape...)






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 960 Reliability/Expense [900][1995]
posted by  someone claiming to be allen  on Tue Jul 30 06:33 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.