The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Was 1971 a good year for the 164?

You want to talk about under-tired... You should take a XK120 jag for a drive... Now thats a real hoot around the bends on 6.00-16 bias ply tube tires.

As for the 164... Go for any '72 or earlier with a manual box. Overdrive is nice if you do highway miles, but the engines don't mind the revs. Of course, some folks like the later styling. Thats a personal problem as far as I'm concerned. Joking...I like both, but I like the earlier ones lots more.

Carbs/FI...thats a personal matter too. I like carbs for the simplicity, and roadside repairability. But...the injection sure is nice for cold starts, and consistant running. As has been said, 164s ain't as sporty feeling as teh 4 bangers. But they sure do pull nicely....

If I had my choice in 164s though, it would be the earliest I could possibly find. I'm a bit envious of George's '69.

-Matt B
'72 164E
'53 XK120
and other 4 cyl volvos






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.