The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Was 1971 a good year for the 164?

The only 164 I owned I ever really enjoyed was a very early non power steering carburettor car. It'd been owned by Michelin to test tyres with. It was very powerful, never figured out whether or not it had been breathed on. It came with a set of Michelin assymetric XAS tyres, they suited that 164 perfectly.

Unfortunately it had a leaky full lenghth Webasto fabric sunroof in it and eventually went terminally rotten.

It actually only part belonged to me for a few days. We found it whilst at university and three of us raided our cash point machines to buy it. A friend of mine really wanted it and he paid us back a few days later. I did lots of mileage in it though.

Over the years I've fallen out of love with 164's, but if I came across another early '69 non power steering car I might just be tempted.


Regards


Pete






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.