Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 1/2008

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Was 1971 a good year for the 164?

posted by  122 and 940 and too many on  Tue Dec 3 14:47 CST 2002
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Mon Apr 25 13:12 CST 2011
[RELATED]

The only 164 I owned I ever really enjoyed was a very early non power steering carburettor car. It'd been owned by Michelin to test tyres with. It was very powerful, never figured out whether or not it had been breathed on. It came with a set of Michelin assymetric XAS tyres, they suited that 164 perfectly.

Unfortunately it had a leaky full lenghth Webasto fabric sunroof in it and eventually went terminally rotten.

It actually only part belonged to me for a few days. We found it whilst at university and three of us raided our cash point machines to buy it. A friend of mine really wanted it and he paid us back a few days later. I did lots of mileage in it though.

Over the years I've fallen out of love with 164's, but if I came across another early '69 non power steering car I might just be tempted.


Regards


Pete






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Was 1971 a good year for the 164? [140-160]
posted by  Lord Volvo subscriber  on Tue Dec 3 04:32 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.