The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

150 kPa versus 75 kPa Cooling Caps: Debate Needed

posted by  Steve on  Sat Sep 13 04:16 CST 2003
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri Oct 24 07:16 CST 2014
[RELATED]

John Sargent pointed out last night that IPD recommends only 75 kPa low-pressure caps when installing their aftermarket Nissens radiators. This is despite the 150kPa Volvo cooling system specification for most RWD cars. What has everyone's experience been on the board with aftermarket radiators (specifically, these Nissen units) and either high or low pressure caps? Any blown cooling systems? Any abnormal leaking?

For what it's worth, I just installed a Nissen aluminum-plastic unit in my 95 940, using the higher-pressure cap, and will be watching it closely.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.