The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

A try at rack & pinion 140-160

Yes, that`s exactly the point I was trying to make, any great difference in the two dimensions will cause the front wheel aligment (toe-in/toe-out) to vary with vertical suspension movement. Also, in the case of body roll one wheel will be pushed in one direction and the other the opposite way, which is not quite what the designer intended, and won`t do much for stability.
In an ideal world, the the two dimensions would be the same, but there is obviously some compromise involved as the ride height varies at any given time, affecting the vertical angle of the track rods and thus the wheel geometry.
The problem is to minimise the effects.

Colin.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.