The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

new 142 140-160

My project isn't going anywhere at the moment :) I also have a very rusty 1972 142s which I had to weld frame and floor sections into just to drive around for the summer (Now a parts car since it went through its second windshield in 6 months) and some new parts.

SOON I will have this 71 142s (which I have never seen in person) and hope that it is as clean body wise as the owner claims. I know the brakes on it are toast but I am not that worried about that.

As for costing a car project.. it's my experience that if you arn't doing it over 10 years you have to at least triple the expected cost.

I am going to have some tranny's I don't need at some point.. do you still need one?

Hudson






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.