The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

might not have been a 72 120-130

Sounds like a fun project... I'm a bit envious. I picked up a pair of what I later identified as Triumph TR3 carbs with velocity stacks at a garage sale for $10. Like you, I just had to try 'em on my Volvo.. because the shafts were tight.

They worked and ran fine, and looked cool being polished and a good bit longer, but leaked like a siv, so now they are just part of the collection. Of course, they didn't offer any more flow being the same size throughts as the Volvo carbs.

As for the flange you mention.. I'm not getting a clear picture of what you are describing, but... if you got a plan that works, go with it.

Good luck!
-Matt

--
-Matt '70 145s, '65 1800s, '66 122s wagon, others inc. '53 XK120 FHC






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.