The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Engine parts finished. 140-160 1974

Sounds reasonable to me. I assume the valve job included hardening the exhaust seats. Neoprene seals last longer, no doubt, and I have them on both ends of one of my engines, and only on the rear on the other. Some "experts" opine, that since they are easy to change on the front and they are less likely to gall the front of the crank, one is better off using the felt seal there. If your engine already came with a neoprene front seal, there is nothing to decide. I have a bunch of oil pumps lying around that are not enough off-spec to throw away, but that I haven't wanted to put into a fresh engine because it is a false economy to save the price of a new pump if, later on, you have to tear down the engine to replace a failed pump, not to mention the damage a failed pump can do.
Bob S.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.