|
This one's for you as well Clayton.
"Let's see, about .000009% of the population use peanut oil and the rest use gasoline and a bit of diesel. You want to save the world, deal with gasoline."
Since when does more popularity make something right or best?? It doesn't. Also, using randomly generated statistics doesn't work as an argument.
"If you are going to go to war, oil is a good reason. Most traded commodity and most valuable, on the planet."
That is sick. From what you wrote it sounds like you are searching for reasons after declaration. So what if oil is big business? Judging you solely by your post, it's people like you who are in power now in business and politics, justifying MURDER for more money. (whether you aggree with the Iraq invasion or not)
"The idea of using food to power cars is unethical and ignores the millions who are starving."
This is laughable.
1 - You are saying: using food as fuel ignores the millions who are starving. Oh dear. How does BURNING 'food' help the hungry? Or to put it in a way you might understand, how does BURNING money help the poor?
2 - What is unethical about finding another fuel source? While i disagree with bio-fuels as a solution to polution, there's nothing unethical about it. Also, how can you use ethics as an argument when you have just justified WAR and DEATH using MONEY?
I sincerely hope your posts on this topic are not an indication of your TRUE beliefs.
Julian
|
