The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Silly brake question 120-130 1967

posted by  matt b on  Fri May 13 09:13 CST 2005
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Tue Oct 14 16:33 CST 2014
[RELATED]

Just put 'em straight in... you run more risk of compromising the longevity of the new parts by taking them apart and getting them back together.

I agree with you on the quality of Volvo parts.. they are top notch... you don't find that with British cars. Then again, you *did* get a Triumph. What were you thinking? (actually, I've always like the GT6...)

Old Jaguar parts are perhaps better in some respects. Worse in some. But the engineering is.. well... lets just not talk about xk120 engineering.

--
-Matt '70 145s, '65 1800s, '66 122s wagon, others inc. '53 XK120 FHC






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.