The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Survey: Which is the better deal? 200

posted by  someone claiming to be Bricklayer on  Tue May 17 09:04 CST 2005 [RELATED]

1. A 1980 242 GT with significant rust around the windshield corners, that burns a quart of oil 'tween changes, with 230K miles, no radio or a/c, decent Virgos, for $700

OR

2. A nice-looking non-flathood '83 turbo 242 with aftermarket intercooler, an as-yet unproblematic wiring-harness problem, minimal rust, super interior for the most part, 195K miles, no a/c, for $1900?

I don't know which should be scarier: oil consumption or a bad wiring harness.

Any ideas?

Thanks!






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.