The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Any downsides to the 5.0 302 Ford conversion? 200

The Ford engine isn't as long lived (durable) as the Volvo redblock, but otherwise starting with a new crate motor (or a very good upgraded rebuilt), you should still see a few hundred thousand miles of service. Problems are usually in installation and in future servicing, and depending on how much you push it, bending or breaking stock suspension parts (replace all bushings with poly and make sure the differential is in good shape).

FWIW, the turbos can be just as reliable as the n/a. Don't push it when it's still cold at startup, let it spin down before shutting off, and use synthetic oil. Beyond an occasional blowout of the intake or exhaust manifold gaskets, the rest of engine is the just as bulletproof as the n/a.

-- Kane
--

While I would never deliberately mislead anyone, take into consideration that any information and advice provided was at no cost to you.


6 Volvos in SoCal, from '64 to '94. See profile for fleet infomation.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.