Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2010 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Any downsides to the 5.0 302 Ford conversion? 200

The Ford engine isn't as long lived (durable) as the Volvo redblock, but otherwise starting with a new crate motor (or a very good upgraded rebuilt), you should still see a few hundred thousand miles of service. Problems are usually in installation and in future servicing, and depending on how much you push it, bending or breaking stock suspension parts (replace all bushings with poly and make sure the differential is in good shape).

FWIW, the turbos can be just as reliable as the n/a. Don't push it when it's still cold at startup, let it spin down before shutting off, and use synthetic oil. Beyond an occasional blowout of the intake or exhaust manifold gaskets, the rest of engine is the just as bulletproof as the n/a.

-- Kane
--

While I would never deliberately mislead anyone, take into consideration that any information and advice provided was at no cost to you.


6 Volvos in SoCal, from '64 to '94. See profile for fleet infomation.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Any downsides to the 5.0 302 Ford conversion? [200]
posted by  Stanley Rockefeller  on Sat Jun 18 12:43 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.