Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2017 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

can and has been done, not really recomendable tho 140-160

I have this car: 142 with a 5.0L Ford mill. I did not do the conversion, just bought it on a lark about a month ago for a daily driver. I concur w/ the above. To do the conversion the engine mounts were redone completely, holes were cut in the front fenders, the exh manifolds were swapped L/R, and downpipes threaded from the front in a u-turn thru the holes. It required a new Modine bigger radiator to keep the temp down, and that required more cutting. There's a C4 auto and a slightly stronger 164 open 3.73:1 rear end.

I call her Frankie, short for Frankenstein. Bottom line: this is pretty fast off the line, dodges traffic like a champ and is fun. But no beauty. A classic sleeper. I lover her to pieces, but it is hard to recommend the surgery.

Paul






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New ford V8 in 140 [140-160]
posted by  PTR  on Thu Nov 17 15:43 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.