Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 9/2010 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

why is the BW35 trans despised? 140-160

Howdy,

I don't think despised is the right word. More, untrusted.

Despite the reputation it has here on the Brickboard, before I came here I had never heard a single derogatory comment about the BW-35. It is what it is; old technology designed to a price point for low-power applications. It was never intended to be pressed into service for more than 50 years.

You were probably right about the low compression being responsible for the slow ascent. The transmission would have pulled with all the authority the engine could muster right up until it overheated.

--
Mr. Shannon DeWolfe -- I've taken to using mister because my name misleads folks on the WWW. I am a 53 year old fat man. ;-)






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New why is the BW35 trans despised? [140-160]
posted by  42  on Fri Apr 17 22:43 CST 2009 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.