Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2003 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

And here's the other half of that example... 200 1989

uid 2796's pic
posted by  bulletproof on  Sat Dec 4 08:11 CST 2010
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri Oct 24 12:02 CST 2014
[RELATED]

...although I must say I had a helluva time finding it. They're my pics but they're not included with my other exhibits when I sort them. They're out there somewhere, though. Probably next time I look they will be present. This seems to be the Broke Board more often than not, lately. Maybe it's time for everyone to send a modest donation.

I've mentioned before, and will do so again now, that the 44.5 mm ø shafts don't seem to include these marks. But that's based on looking at only two shafts that I have in the basement. So sometimes you may need to mark the shafts. But not the flanges.

Short of that there are only two driveshaft matings that look correct. One of them is correct and the other is off by 180°.



--
'80 DL 2 door, '89 DL Wagon






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Driveline vibration revisited [200][1989]
posted by  vacuumhead  on Fri Dec 3 20:07 CST 2010 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.