Volvo RWD 120-130 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 12/2002 120-130 INDEX

[<<] [>>]

VIEW

REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE

SAVE

Why not use multigrade? 120-130 1967

posted by 122 and 940 and too many on Fri Jan 11 23:36 CST 2002
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS]

[IGNORE ALL POSTS]

last visit: Mon Apr 25 13:12 CST 2011

[RELATED]

Strangely the J type was used on the Ford Transit van, and Ford recommended gear oil for that setup.

From experience I'd say the overdrives aren't that bothered what they've got in, but they do insist there's enough of it. Personally I use engine oil since that was what Volvo recommended.

Regards

Pete

THREADED

THREADED EXPANDED

FLAT

PRINT ALL

MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
posted by Toby B on Thu Jan 10 06:16 CST 2002 >

Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
posted by walrus3 subscriber on Thu Jan 10 06:24 CST 2002 > V
- Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
  posted by someone claiming to be iadr on Thu Jan 10 07:22 CST 2002 > V
- Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
  posted by grmper on Thu Jan 10 09:23 CST 2002 > V
  - Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
    posted by walrus3 subscriber on Thu Jan 10 11:35 CST 2002 > V

Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
posted by someone claiming to be shayne on Thu Jan 10 06:47 CST 2002 > V

Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
posted by ODGuru on Thu Jan 10 11:53 CST 2002 > V

Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
posted by matt b on Fri Jan 11 02:59 CST 2002 > V
- Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
  posted by hans on Fri Jan 11 06:50 CST 2002 > V

Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
posted by Toby B on Fri Jan 11 06:33 CST 2002 > V
- Synthetic in an M41? [120-130][1966]
  posted by matt b on Fri Jan 11 07:00 CST 2002 > V

Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
posted by Danny on Fri Jan 11 08:04 CST 2002 > V
- Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
  posted by someone claiming to be chris ulrich on Fri Jan 11 14:41 CST 2002 > V
  - Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
    posted by matt b on Fri Jan 11 15:38 CST 2002 > V
    - Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
      posted by 122 and 940 and too many on Fri Jan 11 23:36 CST 2002 > V
      - Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
        posted by Danny on Sat Jan 12 05:02 CST 2002 > V
        
        Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
        posted by 122 and 940 and too many on Sat Jan 12 10:33 CST 2002 > V
        
        Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
        posted by matt b on Mon Jan 14 03:41 CST 2002 > V
        
        Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1967]
        posted by someone claiming to be chris ulrich on Mon Jan 14 10:36 CST 2002 > V
- Why not use multigrade? [120-130][1966]
  posted by Toby B on Fri Jan 11 17:24 CST 2002 > V

<< < > >>

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.

Volvo RWD/120-130 Forum Index

Community Forums:

RWD

AWD

GATHERINGS

OPINIONS

PICKNPULL

V8

STORIES

Classifieds

Site Features

RWD Series/Models

AWD Series/Models

Volvo RWD 120-130 Forum

Why not use multigrade? 120-130 1967