Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 12/2005 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

'70s 164s 140-160

With a 164 you have to remember that it was aimed essentially at the "old men who smoke cigars market". Between a PV and a 164 you're not comparing apples with apples. PV is serious fun to drive very positive, it turns in well, its light but it is equally very obvious that in essence it's a 60 year old design. Just look though at the potency a PV still has in historic rallying.

A 164 is much more effortless. The 6 cylinder engine has decent power, though not that great given its size and outrageous appetite for petrol. The engine is very heavy and it shows around bends. I've owned several excellent 164's over the years, after a while I just stopped using them. Want a big engined cruiser, buy a Mercedes. If you take that rally analogy a bit further a 300SE fintail can hack it in historic rallying, I don't know of any 164 with any succes in motorsport. The PV on the other hand is still unadulterated joy after years of driving them, and I can forgive a PV just about anything, it brings a smile to my face.

Regards


Pete






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New '70s 164s [140-160]
posted by  someone claiming to be Juan P.  on Thu Apr 4 10:31 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.