Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 6/2002

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Considering a (used) Volvo...

The advice thus far is good. I've owned various japanese cars including Honda, Mazda, and Toyota, and agree that they are more reliable, but not as durable as a RWD Volvo. I think Volvo's are more expensive to fix if you go to the dealer. If you buy parts mail order and do work yourself, Volvos are great - simple and lots of space to work.

I would also consider a 240 if I were you. I own a 740 and a 240, both of the same year, and I think the 240 is a more sound car. The 740 is more modern in numerous ways, but the 240 is more solid.

That being said, if you get a 740 be sure to look at a couple things:
- replace original radiator with an all metal aftermarket (take this seriously)
- avoid the 16 valve (its a fine engine, it just suffers from an interference design like most modern engines. if the timing belt brakes the engine is fried. Stick with the 8 valve boat motor Volvo is famous for.)
- Do not buy a 760/780. Neither will suit your needs.
- Do not buy a turbo. turbos work great on Volvo engines but they introduce a level of complexity and expense that you don't want.
- Don't shy away from the automatic transmission. Most Volvos have them, and they work fine.
--
88 745 GLE 200K, 88 240 GL 150K






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Considering a (used) Volvo...
posted by  jared c  on Mon Jul 15 19:25 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.