Volvo RWD 120-130 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 10/2003 120-130 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Weber pros/con 120-130

Pro (compared to SU):
1) There's only one of them.
2) Slightly better economy if driven for that (and only if).
3) Once tuned, stays in tune forever (good SUs only stay nearly forever).

Con (compared to SU):
1) Fine for a mild motor, but won't support as much power as SUs.
2) Much more complicated to tune, if you need to tune it.
3) Tends to ice up internally on foggy mornings.

A new Weber is much better than worn out SUs. A worn-out Weber is at least as bad as worn out SUs.

Your call.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Weber pros/con [120-130]
posted by  someone claiming to be Davy  on Sat Mar 8 13:33 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.