The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Weber pros/con 120-130

posted by  Phil S. on  Sat Mar 8 13:51 CST 2003
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri Oct 24 13:18 CST 2014
[RELATED]

Pro (compared to SU):
1) There's only one of them.
2) Slightly better economy if driven for that (and only if).
3) Once tuned, stays in tune forever (good SUs only stay nearly forever).

Con (compared to SU):
1) Fine for a mild motor, but won't support as much power as SUs.
2) Much more complicated to tune, if you need to tune it.
3) Tends to ice up internally on foggy mornings.

A new Weber is much better than worn out SUs. A worn-out Weber is at least as bad as worn out SUs.

Your call.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.