Volvo RWD S90-V90 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2010 S90-V90 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

240 vs V90 S90-V90

uid 42's pic
posted by  Shatz on  Tue Oct 28 16:21 CST 2003
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri May 6 11:38 CST 2011
[RELATED]

And it's this kind of complete dicotomy of experiences that bewilder me and make it hard to get a bead on the "real 960". My only (tentitive) conclusion is that there have been a small number that should have never been born...for whatever reason these have been bad from the get go..lemons, I guess. I'ts difficult to explain such opposing reports without lots more data on both successes and failures. It's hard for me to generalize from a relatively small number of complete failures such as Royo's, but nor can I feel comfortable in making broad sweeping generalizations abut a model that have some skeletons in it's closet. Go figure.
--
John Shatzer, '97 V90 @ 105K






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 240 vs V90 [S90-V90]
posted by  someone claiming to be eeriecat  on Mon Oct 27 16:50 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.