Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 6/2003 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

940 vs 240??? 200 1986

posted by  someone claiming to be JWalker on  Thu Feb 26 09:37 CST 2004 [RELATED]


I agree there is something appealing about the "uncivilized" nature of a 240! They are more communicative than either a 740 or a 940. Reminds me a little of the BMW 2002 I used to own.

Don't know about the ECU's. Since the 740's had a manual tranny I would think that you could convert a 940 to a manual. Someone here must know how to do it.

My 240 is the first car I have ever owned with a "slushbox". Although I would prefer a stick, the AW70/71 are great trannies - no complaints...They work well in the 240's/940's. You might consider trying one out.

I still prefer a manual in a BMW, VW or other sporty car....





THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 940 vs 240??? [200][1986]
posted by  someone claiming to be Cabbie2169  on Wed Feb 25 15:19 CST 2004 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.