Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2003 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

This is my dream... 140-160 1974


Aha, ok. That makes things a bit clearer to me. Obvious why turbo = no overlap and with supercharging some is good.

But still a question arises to me: As I thought -and you explaned- when charging it's good to have larger exhaust then intake valves. You say "with turbo charged enines the ratio of pressure on the exhaust side vs pressure on the inlet side can be as bad as 2:1" So increasing outlet valve size would be a good thing. But why is this so? Is it only because of the somewhat smaller exhaust valve and port? I could imagine because of the turbo, the exhaust flow is restriced even more. But then again, that is not the case on supercharged engines. Thinking this over I would say that when using a belt driven charger you would indeed need somewhat bigger exhaust valves, but when using a turbo you'll need heaps bigger exhaust valves because of even more presure in the exhaust side. (or would valve size not matter because of the restriction due to the turbo then?)

Thanks again, Ben
--
Volvo P130, 1965: B18A + tilted M47. Volvo P131, 1969: B20 + AW71L: in the proces of rebuilding (www.knutselsmurf.web1000.com)






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New This is my dream... [140-160][1974]
posted by  Kåre  on Sun Feb 29 12:21 CST 2004 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.