Volvo RWD 444-544 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 4/2019 444-544 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Addendum 444-544

uid 5098's pic
posted by  Sil on  Fri Apr 1 16:03 CST 2011
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri Oct 24 07:24 CST 2014
[RELATED]

Yes, I realize that. That's why I thought that the top image on the page below might provide an answer in that, at least on some of the Duetts, they used pretty high brackets on top of the crossmember (much higher than on the 544s), probably, with the M40, to make up for the low crossmember and the short "tower" and bring the shifter receiver higher up into the tunnel hole. I see no reason why bolting a "platform" onto the top of the crossmember shouldn't be the best solution for you. That way you can attach the hardware you have the way you showed in the diagram and picture you posted.



--
‘62 PV544 (B20, M41), '71 142E (Ex-automatic, now carbed), '93 240 Classic Wagon.






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Looking for pictures of the shifter hole [444-544]
posted by  malloy1  on Mon Mar 28 23:00 CST 2011 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.