Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 9/2017 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

performance differences between '87 and '92 200

uid 27's pic
posted by  Art Benstein on  Wed Dec 30 11:09 CST 2015
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri Oct 17 20:10 CST 2014
[RELATED]

Agreed 100% Onkel. The HP ratings and torque curves are the same stock. A stick might make a perception difference as you note, but after all gets you to the end of the block just as quickly.

I've had a few 240s from 79 to 91 and the only ones which had significantly differing performance are the turbocharged cars. Or that 91 we bought with the timing belt a tooth off :-)
--
Art Benstein near Baltimore

"I am going to buy a Volkswagen or a foreign car." -Yogi Berra 1925-2015






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New performance differences between '87 and '92 [200]
posted by  riverbend subscriber  on Tue Dec 29 17:19 CST 2015 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.