Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 2/2003

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

940 - To turbo or not?

posted by  pbonsalb on  Wed May 22 06:27 CST 2002
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Fri May 9 09:43 CST 2008
[RELATED]

I would not enjoy driving a non turbo RWD Volvo. 3200+ lbs and only 114 hp does not make for fun driving. But be prepared to spend a bit more over time, as the turbo will fail eventually and it adds heat and heat causes other parts to fail sooner. I would have the cooling system checked out, but I would recommend that on any Volvo. I would recommend a coolant level sensor per the 700/900 FAQ if the proposed car does not have one. One would have saved me from my two overheats (one with bad results, one without).

The small turbo 90-95 740/940 Turbos run very well in daily driving, compared to the 84-89 larger turbo 740 Turbos, particularly with respect to the automatic transmission versions.

Philip Bradley






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 940 - To turbo or not?
posted by  someone claiming to be thomas  on Wed May 22 00:57 CST 2002 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.