Volvo RWD 444-544 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 11/2004 444-544 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

V8 conversion 444-544

Charles,

Thanks for the input. I have heard that replacing the Volvo front end with a Mustang II subframe takes care of the sump location problems, plus allows for the wider engine and allows for Ford discs to boot. Who knows, maybe a guy could get rack and pinion in there too!

Like you, I have some concerns for the overall weight, and I would no doubt gow with aluminum heads, etc with the Ford motor (although I have heard that the 289 only weighs 75 lb more than a B16). I have done two builds on the venerable 302, and frankly I love the little Windsor block. What's more, it can be stroked to 351 ci, which should be enough to "do in" my buddy's Camaro. There is a lot to be said for the Buick engine though. Rover's 4.2 and 4.6 L engines are really Buicks once you scratch the paint off. And they are really lightweight, with lots of potential for hp and torque, as I understand it--they certainly are worth a look-see.

I read with much interest, the Buick V6 conversion completed by the retired firefighter. I was very impressed with the guy's work.

Thanks so much for the tips. Right now, I have a "project" car which will consume another year, but I am in the market for a "roller" PV544 which I can park off to the side for now, but use for planning purposes.

Mike






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New V8 conversion [444-544]
posted by  MDN  on Fri Dec 5 06:48 CST 2003 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.