Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2016 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Are your sure? 140-160

Ken,

I'm sure you agree that locked brakes don't slow the car as quickly as ones that permit the tires to turn just a bit underspeed. If the fronts lock prematurely relative to the rears, you're not getting full braking from the rears -- and that's significant, even though most of the braking is being accomplished by the fronts. There's not just there for ballast; the car would be fully stable in a straight line with no rear brakes at all.

When mods increase the effectiveness of the front brakes, it's therefore also necessary to provide a matching increase in the rear. The simplest way to do that is to divert hydraulic pressure away from the fronts and send it to the rear brakes, and an adjustable proportioning valve (or possibly alternate limiting valves from a different model, as Jack suggests) is the way to do that.

There's a lot more to the subject than this thread will bear -- the optimum biasing varies with speed, for instance -- but the short answer is, Yes, I am sure.

There's an excellent article on brake biasing in the current issue of Grassroots Motorsports, BTW. Check it out if you can get your hands on a copy.

--Phil






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 240 brakes onto '69 142 [140-160]
posted by  Daz  on Sat Jan 10 15:56 CST 2004 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.