Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 12/2006 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

I second everything you said, plus: 200

posted by  richink on  Sat Mar 13 14:14 CST 2004
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Wed Dec 22 04:40 CST 2010
[RELATED]

Hello,

I totally agree with 200 series Volvo cultism as it progresses to higher levels of both mileage and recognition for it's simplicity.

But correct me if I am wrong, but we are talking about basic multiplexed wiring. Get over it. Car manufacturers have been using it for years now. An 8 year old Honda Civic even has it.

As far as servo throttles are concerned, they have also been around for years in many succesful applications. As far as the peice-of-shitism you experienced with an Olds Bravada ie. GMC Jimmy, Envoy and 5 other brand names, remember that this is just another innovation from the company that brought us such innovations as the 4-6-8 engine, the quad(rapalegic) four, 3-channel ABS and most notably the Olds Acheiva and other such twins. Let us note that in it's first year (1991 - the 16th year of production for the 240) it was rated the worst car to be involved in a front collision with. Which was the best? 200 series cultism strikes again.

--
Richard - '87 245 DL , '82 242 GLT - Half a million km between them!!!






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Saw the new S40 today (offtopic) [200]
posted by  someone claiming to be bosozoku  on Sat Mar 13 09:57 CST 2004 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.