Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 5/2005

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

JD Power Long Term Ratings for 94-95 940s

I can't think of a reason for it, unless the group included 1995+ 960 models. There wre significant changes in the 960 for 1995 and they were not all for the better.
Primarily, I will bet that every single owner has had to either change door panels, or put up with ugly wrinkled vinyl on the doors. This was a major mistake on Volvo's part, and affected just about every car. Replacement was of course a major undertaking and if I'm not mistaken, about $800 per car. That would leave a bad taste in my mouth if I were the owner of a high-end car like this.
If the sample group excludes 960s, I can only guess it's an anomaly. The 95 940 is a fine car and they should have continued selling it here well past that date as they did in the rest of the world.
--
Rob Bareiss, New London CT ::: '87 244DL/M47- 230K, 88 744GLE- 220K, 82 245T-181K Also responsible for the care and feeding of: 88 745GLE, 231K, 87 244DL, 239K, 94 855GLT 189K






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New JD Power Long Term Ratings for 94-95 940s
posted by  VolvoGirlNYC  on Wed Nov 17 19:01 CST 2004 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.